Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: R & Anor v. Independent Broad-based Anti-Corruption Commissioner
Date: 2 February 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 25m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Crown Melbourne Limited v. Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd & Anor
Case No.
M253/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
22/12/2014 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Warren CJ, Whelan JA & Santamaria J A)
[2014] VSCA 353 [2015] VSCA 56
Catchwords
Equity – Promissory estoppel – Where respondent operated restaurants at appellant’s complex - Where the appellant made representations to the respondent that if certain refurbishments were made respondent would be “looked after” when it came time to renew the lease for the premises – Whether an ambiguous representation is capable of founding a promissory estoppel – Whether a promissory estoppel can be found to exist by proving the making and the resiling from a representation made.
Documents
11/12/2015 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)
24/12/2015 Notice of appeal
24/12/2015 Notice of Cross-appeal (Respondents)
29/01/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
29/01/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
19/02/2016 Written submissions (Respondents)
04/03/2016 Reply
11/03/2016 Reply on Cross-appeal (Respondents)
05/05/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
20/07/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Alqudsi v. The Queen
Case No.
S279/2015
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitutional law – Trial by jury for Commonwealth indictable offences – Whether s 80 of the Constitution can be read to permit a state Parliament to pass a statute allowing for a trial to be by a judge alone where the prosecution and accused agree or the accused seeks that outcome and the Court considers it in the interest of justice – Whether such a position would be consistent with Brown v The Queen.
Documents
15/12/2015 Hearing (Single Justice, Perth v/link Sydney)
15/12/2015 Cause removed
22/12/2015 Notice of constitutional matter (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
21/01/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
21/01/2016 Chronology
25/01/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
25/01/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
25/01/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania intervening)
25/01/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
29/01/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
02/02/2016 Written submission (Respondent)
05/02/2016 Reply (Appellant)
05/02/2016 Reply (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth, intervening)
10/02/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
15/06/2016 Reasons for Judgment (Judgment summary)
Deal v. Father Pius Kodakkathanath
Case No.
M252/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
24/07/2015 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Warren CJ, Ashley JA & Digby AJA)
Catchwords
Workers? compensation – Accident compensation – Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2007 (Vic) r 3.1.2 (“regulations”) – Where appellant fell off a step ladder whilst attempting to remove large displays from a wall and suffered a knee injury – Whether “associated with” in the phrase “associated with a hazardous manual handling task affecting an employee” requires a close connection between the manual handling task and the anticipated risk – Whether injury is the kind that the regulations are designed to prevent – Whether regulations should be interpreted to apply to an injury occasioned by the stresses or forces involved in the activity.
Documents
11/12/2015 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)
23/12/2015 Notice of appeal
29/01/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
29/01/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
19/02/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
04/03/2016 Reply
08/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
24/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Betts v. The Queen
Case No.
S281/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
24/03/2015 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Meagher JA, Hidden J, RS Hulme AJ)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Sentencing – Where Court of Criminal Appeal found that the sentencing judge made errors in the sentencing of appellant – Where Court of Appeal considered the matter afresh – Whether Court of Appeal erred by failing to consider new evidence when exercising the sentencing discretion afresh.
Documents
11/12/2015 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
22/12/2015 Notice of appeal
29/01/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
29/01/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
19/02/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
08/03/2016 Reply
08/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
15/06/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)