Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Nguyen v. The Queen
Date: 10 March 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 1h 15m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Attwells & Anor v. Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Limited
Date: 08 March 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 5h 12m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Hall v. Hall
Case No.
A7/2016
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
7/08/2015 Family Court of Australia (Thackray J, Strickland J & Aldridge J)
Catchwords
Family – Spousal maintenance – Appeal from an interlocutory order – Where primary judge made order that respondent husband pay spousal maintenance on the basis that applicant wife was ‘unable to support herself adequately’ under s 72(1) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) – Where applicant wife’s deceased father’s will contains ‘wish’ that the applicant wife receives annual payment of $150,000 net of income tax until such time as she receives a payment of $16.5 million – Whether voluntary payment is a ‘financial resource’ under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Documents
12/02/2016 Hearing (SLA, Canberra v/link Adelaide)
25/02/2016 Notice of appeal
18/03/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
23/03/2016 Amended Written submissions (Appellant)
08/04/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
22/04/2016 Reply
04/05/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/06/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
W.A. Glendinning & Associates Pty Ltd v. The State of Western Australia
Case No.
P63/2015
Related Matters
P4/2016 Maranoa Transport Pty Ltd (In Liq) & Ors v. State of Western Australia & Ors
S248/2015 Bell Group N.V. (In Liquidation) & Anor v. State of Western Australia
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitution – s 109 – inconsistency – Bell Group Companies (Finalisation of Matters and Distribution of Proceeds) Act 2015 (WA) (“Bell Group Act”) – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) and Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – whether parts 3 & 4 of the Bell Group Act are inconsistent with the Commonwealth?s tax regime – Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – where Bell Group Act ends litigation in the Western Australian Supreme Court – where litigation involves federal jurisdiction – whether Bell Group Act is inconsistent with Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – whether the Bell Group Act is inconsistent with Ch III of the Constitution – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether Bell Group Act is inconsistent with Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether ss 5F and 5G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) operate to avoid any inconsistency with the Bell Group Act– whether Bell Group Act can be severed.
Documents
18/12/2015 Writ of summons
08/02/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)
26/02/2016 Amended Special Case
04/03/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)
04/03/2016 Chronology (Plaintiffs)
08/03/2016 Proposed written submissions (Federal Commission of Taxation seeking leave to interevene)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Defendant)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Stateof Queensland intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
24/03/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney v/link to Perth)
29/03/2016 Substituted written submissions (Defendant)
30/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia intervening)
01/04/2016 Reply
01/04/2016 Reply (Defendant's reply to Commonwealth Attorney-General's submissions)
05/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/04/2016 Supplementary written submissions (Defendant)
07/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
16/05/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Maranoa Transport Pty Ltd (in Liq) (ACN 009 668 393) & Ors v. State of Western Australia & Ors
Case No.
P4/2016
Related Matters
P63/2015 W.A. Glendinning & Associates Pty Ltd v. The State of Western Australia
S2482015 Bell Group N.V. (In Liquidation) & Anor v. State of Western Australia
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitution – s 109 – inconsistency – Bell Group Companies (Finalisation of Matters and Distribution of Proceeds) Act 2015 (WA) (“Bell Group Act”) – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) and Tax Administration Act 1953 (Cth) – whether parts 3 & 4 of the Bell Group Act are inconsistent with the Commonwealth?s tax regime – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether Bell Group Act is inconsistent with Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether ss 5F and 5G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) operate to avoid any inconsistency with the Bell Group Act – whether Bell Group Act can be severed.
Documents
04/02/2016 Writ of summons
11/02/2016 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiffs)
12/02/2016 Submitting appearance (Second Defendants)
08/02/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra v/links Perth and Sydney)
24/02/2016 Special case stated
03/03/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiffs)
03/03/2016 Chronology (Plaintiffs)
08/03/2016 Proposed written submissions (Federal Commission of Taxation seeking leave to interevene)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (First Defendant)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania intervening)
23/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
24/03/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney v/link to Perth)
29/03/2016 Substituted written submissions (First Defendant)
30/03/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia intevening)
31/03/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Sydney v/link to Perth)
01/04/2016 Reply
01/04/2016 Reply (Defendant's reply to Commonwealth Attorney-General's submissions)
05/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/04/2016 Supplementary written submissions (Defendant)
07/04/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
16/05/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)