Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Cases:

Date: 03 May 2016

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 1h 37m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra

Cases:

Date: 02 May 2016

Transcript: Hearing

AV time: 1h 59m

 

You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.

 

Terms of use

Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:

(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court.  However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.

(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.

(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.

By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.

 

Prince Alfred College Incorporated v. ADC

Case No.

A20/2016

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

10/11/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Full Court) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Peek J)

[2015] SASCFC 161

Catchwords

Torts – Negligence – Negligence of school authorities or teachers – Liability of employer – Limitation of actions – Extension of time in personal injuries matters – Knowledge of material facts of decisive character – Principles upon which discretion to grant extension of time – Whether Full Court erred in granting extension of time.

Short Particulars

Documents

15/04/2016 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)

28/04/2016 Notice of appeal

20/05/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)

20/05/2016 Chronology (Appellant)

10/06/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)

24/06/2016 Reply

21/07/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

05/10/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)

Stakaj v. The Director of Public Prosecutions

Case No.

A19/2016

Related matters.

A14/2016 NH v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;

A15/2016 Jakaj v. The Direction of Public Prosecutions

A16/2016 Zefi v. The Director of Public Prosecutions

Case Information

Lower Court Judgment

25/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Sulan J)

[2015] SASCFC 139

Catchwords

Criminal law – procedure – jury – verdict – alternative verdict – exercise of jurisdiction – whether the Supreme Court of a State has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside perfected orders that there be a conviction or acquittal – whether open to the court to admit evidence of the 12 (former) jurors in relation to whether the jury had determined to return a verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder.

Short Particulars

Documents

11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)

13/04/2016 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)

20/04/2016 Notice of appeal

20/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)

20/04/2016 Chronology

27/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)

06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)

18/05/2016 Reply

09/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

31/08/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)

31/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)

Madden & Ors v. Australian Electoral Officer for the State of Tasmania & Ors

Case No.

S109/2016

Related matter:

S77/2016 – Day v. Australian Electoral Officer for the State of South Australia & Anor

Case Information

Catchwords

Constitution – election of Senators – ss 9 and 7 – where constitution requires uniform method for the election of Senators – whether Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth)as amended by Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 2016 (Cth) provides for one method for the election of Senators– whether allowing a person to vote for a party is contrary to the requirement for a Senator to be directly chosen by the people – whether the use of a party logo discriminates against independent candidates – whether the method to elect Senators under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth)disenfranchises voters – whether amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) are contrary to the constitutional guarantee of freedom of political communication – whether amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) are compatible with the constitutionally prescribed system of representative government.

Short particulars

Documents

14/04/2016 Application for an order to show cause

15/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra by v/link Sydney)

15/04/2016 Submitting Appearance (First to Seventh Defendants)

02/05/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

03/05/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)

13/05/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)

Page 183 of 278