Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v. Flight Centre Travel Group Limited
Case No.
B15/2016
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
31/07/2015 Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Allsop CJ, Davies J, Wigney J)
Catchwords
Competition – whether appellant travel agent attempted to induce specific airlines to make a contract, arrangement or arrive at an understanding which had the purpose or effect of substantially lessening competition in a market – consideration of relevant market – characterisation of relevant services supplied by airlines and travel agents – whether airlines and travel agents competed in a market for booking and distribution services, or whether the only relevant market was the market for international passenger air travel services – whether travel agents competed with airlines in that market given they were the agent of the airlines when supplying such services – application of ss 45 and 45A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
29/03/2016 Notice of appeal
15/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
15/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
12/05/2016 Written submissions (International Air Transport Association as amicus curiae)
19/05/2016 Reply
27/07/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Brisbane)
14/12/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Zefi v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case No.
A16/2016
Related matters:
A14/2016 NH v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;
A15/2016 Jakaj v. Director of Public Prosecutions;
A19/2016 Stakaj v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Sulan J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – procedure – jury – verdict – alternative verdict – exercise of jurisdiction – whether the Supreme Court of a State has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside perfected orders that there be a conviction or acquittal – whether open to the court to admit evidence of the 12 (former) jurors in relation to whether the jury had determined to return a verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder.
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
29/03/2016 Notice of appeal
15/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
15/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
27/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)
06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
20/05/2016 Reply
09/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
31/08/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)
31/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)
Jakaj v. Director of Public Prosecutions
Case No.
A15/2016
Related matters:
A14/2016 NH v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;
A16/2016 Zefi v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;
A19/2016 Stakaj v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J & Sulan J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – procedure – jury – verdict – alternative verdict – exercise of jurisdiction – whether the Supreme Court of a State has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside perfected orders that there be a conviction or acquittal – whether open to the court to admit evidence of the 12 (former) jurors in relation to whether the jury had determined to return a verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder.
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
29/03/2016 Notice of appeal
15/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
15/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
27/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)
06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
20/05/2016 Reply
09/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
31/08/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)
31/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)
NH v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case No.
A14/2016
Related Matters:
A15/2016 Jakaj v. Director of Public Prosecutions;
A16/2016 Zefi v. The Director of Public Prosecutions;
A19/2016 Stakaj v. The Director of Public Prosecutions
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/09/2015 Supreme Court of South Australia (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kourakis CJ, Gray J, Sulan J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – procedure – jury – verdict – alternative verdict – exercise of jurisdiction – whether the Supreme Court of a State has an inherent jurisdiction to set aside perfected orders that there be a conviction or acquittal – whether open to the court to admit evidence of the 12 (former) jurors in relation to whether the jury had determined to return a verdict of not guilty of the charge of murder.
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
24/03/2016 Notice of appeal
15/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
15/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
27/04/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne v/link Adelaide)
06/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
24/05/2016 Amended Reply
09/06/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
31/08/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra)
31/08/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)
Lyons v. State of Queensland
Case No.
B16/2016
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
28/08/2015 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Holmes JA, Gotterson JA, Mullins J)
Catchwords
Discrimination – direct discrimination – where the appellant, who was deaf, was excluded from jury service by a Deputy Registrar – where the appellant made a complaint of direct discrimination – construction of s 11 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) – where the appellant argues that her impairment was inextricably linked to her requirement of an Auslan interpreter – construction of Jury Act 1995 (Qld).
Documents
11/03/2016 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
29/03/2016 Notice of appeal
15/04/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
15/04/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
09/05/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
23/05/2016 Reply
25/07/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Brisbane)
05/10/2016 Judgment (Judgment Summary)