Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v. Republic of Nauru & Anor
Date: 02 September 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 00m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Limited & Anor v. Northern Territory of Australia
Date: 02 September 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 1h 52m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Limited & Anor v. Northern Territory of Australia
Date: 01 September 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 28m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Fair Work Ombudsman v. Quest South Perth Holdings Pty Ltd & Ors
Case No.
P38/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
17/03/2015 Federal Court of Australia (North J, Barker J, Bromberg J)
Catchwords
Employment law – Employment relationship – Nature of – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 357 - Where first respondent operated a business providing serviced apartments – Where first respondent employed two housekeepers purportedly through a contract hire company – Whether relationship was an employment relationship – Whether an employer can avoid the sham contracting provision of the Fair Work Act by interposing a third party into its contractual arrangements between employer and the other person.
Documents
14/08/2015 Hearing (SLA, Perth)
27/08/2015 Notice of appeal
03/09/2015 Submitting appearance (Third Respondent)
18/09/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)
18/09/2015 Chronology (Appellant)
09/10/2015 Written submissions (Second Respondent)
23/10/2015 Reply
04/11/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
02/12/2015 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Fernando by his Tutor Ley v. Commonwealth of Australia & Anor
Case No.
P37/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
22/12/2014 Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Besanko J, Barker J, Robertson J)
Catchwords
Torts – False imprisonment – Where appellant’s visa was cancelled by Acting Minister – Where appellant was held in immigration detention for 1203 days – Where consent orders were made to quash decision of Acting Minister to cancel the visa – Whether a tortfeasor is permitted to escape liability to pay more than nominal damages if a lawful means could have been chosen by the tortfeasor to inflict the same loss and damage on the victim – Whether, after a determination of liability, an intermediate court of appeal remits a matter for assessment of damages whether the remittee court is bound in reaching its determination by the reasons as well as the orders of the remitting court.
Documents
14/08/2015 Hearing (SLA, Perth)
27/08/2015 Notice of appeal
18/09/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)
18/09/2015 Chronology (Appellant)
14/10/2015 Written submissions (Respondents)
28/10/2015 Reply
05/11/2015 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)