Zaburoni v. The Queen
Case No.
B69/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
15/04/2014 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Gotterson J, Morrison J, Applegarth J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Criminal liability – Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) s 317 - Element of intent to cause a specific result – Where appellant is HIV positive – Where appellant commenced a relationship with complainant – Where appellant did not disclose HIV status – Where complainant was diagnosed with HIV after engaging in unprotected sex with appellant – Where appellant was found guilty of transmitting a serious disease with intent – Whether the element of intent to cause a specific result can be satisfied by establishing that an accused engaged in a course of conduct over a significant period time and was reckless as to the potential consequences of that conduct – Whether the element of intent can be inferred from an awareness of increased risk where conduct is engaged in frequently and over a period of time – Whether intent can be inferred from frequent conduct where the precise time at which the intent formed and the result occurred cannot be identified.
Documents
13/11/2015 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
27/11/2015 Notice of appeal
10/12/2015 Written submissions (Appellant)
10/12/2015 Chronology (Appellant)
15/01/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
22/01/2016 Reply
09/02/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/04/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Badenach & Anor v. Calvert
Case No.
H12/2015
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
24/07/2015 Full Court of the Supreme Court of Tasmania (Tennent J, Porter J and Estcourt J)
Catchwords
Professions and trades – Lawyers – Duties and liabilities – Solicitors? duties to other persons – Beneficiaries – Where first appellant acted for a testator who had terminal cancer in the preparation of a will – Where respondent was regarded as a son by testator – Where testator had an estranged daughter – Where testator did not disclose existence of estranged daughter and first appellant did not make any inquiries in this respect and did not give any advice as the effect of the Testator’s Family Maintenance Act 1912 (Tas) on this arrangement – Whether a solicitor retained to draw a will owes a testator a duty of care which extends to inquiries as to the existence of estranged children and advice pursuant to the effect of the Act.
Torts – Negligence – Duty of care – Civil Liability Act 2002 (Tas) - Whether solicitor owed a duty of care to a non-client beneficiary – Whether damages for loss of opportunity can be awarded where opportunity is hypothetical and dependent on acts of third parties.
Documents
26/10/2015 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane by v/link to Melbourne)
05/11/2015 Notice of appeal
30/11/2015 Written submissions (Appellants)
30/11/2015 Chronology (Appellants)
21/12/2015 Written submissions (Respondent)
18/01/2016 Reply
02/03/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Hobart)
11/05/2016 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Wei v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Date: 12 November 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 14m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
Date: 11 November 2015
Transcripts: Hearing (Tabcorp Holdings Limited v. State of Victoria) and Hearing (State of Victoria v. Tatts Group Limited)
AV time: 4h 33m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
| State of Victoria v. Tatts Group Limited |
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
Date: 10 November 2015
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 32m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.