Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: FEL17 V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Date: 06 December 2024
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 1h 02m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Khalil v. Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs & Anor
Case No.
M112/2024
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
11/09/2024 Federal Court of Australia (Katzmann, Dowling and McDonald JJ)
Catchwords
Immigration – Ministerial Directions under s 499 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – visa cancellation – point in time of application of Direction - where Ministerial Direction 65 applied at time of delegate’s decision refusing to revoke cancellation of appellant’s visa – whether Full Court erred in failing to find Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in applying later Ministerial Direction 90 in conducting review – whether appellant had accrued right for Direction 65 to be applied for purposes of s 7(2)(c) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth).
Documents*
05/12/2024 Determination
12/12/2024 Notice of appeal
24/12/2024 Written submissions (Appellant)
24/12/2024 Chronology (Appellant)
20/02/2025 Written submissions (First Respondent)
11/03/2025 Reply
01/04/2025 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
01/04/2025 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
01/04/2025 Outline of oral argument (First Respondent)
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION V J HUTCHINSON PTY LTD (ACN 009 778 330) & ANOR
Date: 05 December 2024
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 24m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Plaintiff M19A/2024 & Ors v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Case No.
M92/2024; M97/2024
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
18/10/2024 High Court of Australia (Gordon J)
Catchwords
High Court – appellate jurisdiction – practice – reasons for judgment – where first three appellants granted permanent protection visas in 2011 – where delegate of respondent sent "Notice of Intention to Consider Cancellation" to first appellant under s 116 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where first appellant did not receive notification because of change of address – where respondent proceeded to cancellation of visa in 2019 – where first appellant did not receive notification and only discovered cancellation in June 2021 – where no review available in Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where appellants sought constitutional or other writ in original jurisdiction of High Court – application dismissed by primary judge (Gordon J) – where on appeal the appellants sought leave to argue new ground not raised below – whether the decision of the delegate of the Minister to cancel the first appellant's protection visa was vitiated by jurisdiction error – where the delegate of the Minister gave weight to the fact that the fist appellant did not respond to the notice – where there was no legal obligation on the first appellant to respond to such a notice – where, before the hearing of the appeal, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs conceded jurisdictional error raised by the appellants – consent to orders allowing the appeal filed by the parties – whether reasons for decision required when orders sought by consent – whether appropriate to make orders by consent.
Documents*
01/11/2024 Notice of Appeal (M92/2024)
15/11/2024 Application for leave to appeal (M97/2024)
03/12/2024 Order consolidating matters and making programming orders
11/12/2024 Amended Notice of appeal
31/01/2025 Written submissions (Appellants)
31/01/2025 Chronology (Appellants)
28/02/2025 Written submissions (Respondent)
14/03/2025 Reply
10/04/2025 Judgment (Judgment summary)
*The due dates shown for documents on this page are indicative only.
The King v. Batak
Case No.
S148/2024
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
10/05/2024 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Kirk JA, Wilson and Ierace JJ)
Catchwords
Criminal law – complicity – accessorial liability – whether common law principles of complicity apply to offence of murder under s 18(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – whether Court of Criminal Appeal erred in concluding it was error of law to permit constructive law to be left to jury on basis of accessorial liability – whether accessory before the fact to constructive murder an offence known to law in New South Wales – if so, whether mental element differs depending on whether act causing death coincides with physical elements of foundational offence of whether a distinct act.
Documents*
07/11/2024 Determination
21/11/2024 Notice of appeal
06/02/2025 Written submissions (Appellant)
06/02/2025 Chronology (Appellant)
27/02/2025 Written submissions (Respondent)
06/03/2025 Reply
08/04/2025 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/04/2025 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
08/04/2025 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)