Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Williams v. Commonwealth of Australia & Ors
Date: 07 May 2014
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 29m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Williams v. Commonwealth of Australia & Ors
Date: 06 May 2014
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 28m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Alphapharm Pty Ltd v. H Lundbeck A/S & Ors
Case No.
S97/2014
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
18/11/2013 Federal Court of Australia (Jessup, Jagot & Yates JJ)
Catchwords
Patents - Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ("Act"), s 223(2)(a) - First respondent patentee applied to Commissioner of Patents to extend term of its patent under s 70(1) of Act - Commissioner of Patents granted extension of term - Extension of term later revoked and removed from Register according to orders of Full Federal Court - First respondent applied to Commissioner of Patents for extension of time within which to file second application to extend term of patent - Commissioner of Patents granted extension of time - Decision appealed to Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") which affirmed Commissioner's decision to grant extension of time - Whether s 223(2)(a) of Act conferred power on Commissioner of Patents to extend time for seeking an extension of term of patent under s 70(1) of Act - Whether exercise of discretion to extend time was manifestly unreasonable in circumstances where the applicant for extension failed to apply promptly for extension - Whether appellant had to demonstrate significant and specific prejudice or hardship to disentitle first respondent to extension - Whether AAT failed to take into account relevant considerations and took into account irrelevant considerations.
Documents
11/04/2014 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
24/04/2014 Notice of appeal
01/05/2014 Submitting appearance (Second Respondent)
05/05/2014 Submitting appearance (Third Respondent)
05/05/2014 Submitting appearance (Fifth Respondent)
16/05/2014 Written submissions (Appellant)
16/05/2014 Chronology (Appellant)
06/06/2014 Written submissions (First Respondent)
13/06/2014 Written submissions (The Institute of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys seeking leave to intervene)
20/06/2014 Reply
01/08/2014 Written submissions (Generic Medicines Industry Association seeking leave to intervene)
08/08/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
05/11/2014 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Commissioner of Taxation v. MBI Properties Pty Ltd
Case No.
S90/2014
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
18/10/2013 Federal Court of Australia (Edmonds J, Farrell J, Davies J)
Catchwords
Taxation - A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) ("Act"), s 135-5 - Third party owner of estate in fee simple granted lease to tenant for ten year term - Third party sold reversion to respondent who received rent after sale - Declaration made by Full Federal Court that there was no supply by respondent to tenant - Commissioner of Taxation assessed respondent on basis that s 135-5 applied - Respondent objected on ground that there was no supply - Whether there was "continuing supply" after sale of reversion of lease to respondent - Whether respondent had "increasing adjustment" under s 135-5 of Act.
Documents
11/04/2014 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
22/04/2014 Notice of appeal
16/05/2014 Written submissions (Appellant)
16/05/2014 Chronology (Appellant)
06/06/2014 Written submissions (Respondent)
20/06/2014 Reply
11/09/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
04/11/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
03/12/2014 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Versi v. The Queen
Case No.
S296/2013
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
14/11/2013 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Basten JA, Adams and Lathan JJ)
Catchwords
Evidence - Admissibility - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 98(1), 137 or 101(2) - Complainant gave evidence admitted in relation to one count of indecency on person under 16 years of age - Whether evidence inadmissible on basis that it did not have significant probative value or that probative value was outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice to applicant or that probative value did not substantially outweigh prejudicial effect on applicant - Whether admitted evidence treated improperly by being given undue weight and being used to support finding of guilt on count for which it was not admitted - Whether there was miscarriage of justice.
Documents
13/12/2013 Application for special leave to appeal
11/04/2014 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
16/05/2014 Written submissions (Applicant)
16/05/2014 Chronology (Applicant)
06/06/2014 Written submissions (Respondent)
20/06/2014 Reply
14/08/2014 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording) (Special leave refused)