Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v. Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act
Date: 05 October 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 29m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v. Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act
Date: 04 October 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 02m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
AAR15 v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Case No.
P50/2016
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
19/02/2016 Federal Court of Australia (North J)
Catchwords
Administrative law – Jurisdictional error – Provision of reasons – Where Refugee Review Tribunal preferred one piece of evidence over another piece of contrary evidence closer in time to the decision being made – Where no reasons were provided for preference of one piece of evidence contrary to another – Where appellant court speculated as to why Tribunal made preference of one piece of evidence contrary to another.
Documents
02/09/2016 Hearing (SLA, Canberra v/link Perth)
16/09/2016 Notice of appeal
05/10/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
14/10/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
11/11/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
Hughes v. The Queen
Case No.
S226/2016
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
21/12/2015 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Beazley P, Schmidt J, Button J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Tendency evidence – Significant probative value – Whether trial judge erred in admitting tendency evidence – Whether trial judge properly accounted for risk of contamination and concoction in assessing significant probative value – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 97 – Prejudicial effect of tendency evidence – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 101 – Whether directions to jury sufficient.
Documents
02/09/2016 Hearing (SLA, Sydney)
16/09/2016 Notice of appeal
07/10/2016 Written submissions (Appellant)
07/10/2016 Chronology (Appellant)
28/10/2016 Written submissions (Respondent)
04/11/2016 Written submissions (Director of Public Prosecutions - Victoria seeking leave to intervene)
11/11/2016 Reply
03/01/2017 Amended written submissions (Director of Public Prosecutions - Victoria seeking leave to intervene)
08/02/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
14/06/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Palmer v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors
Case No.
B52/2016
Related Matter:
B55/2016 – Ferguson v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq)
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitutional law – Validity of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Where plaintiff had been a director of a company on a number of occasions – Where company was subsequently placed into administration – Where Federal Court issued summons, pursuant to s 596A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), to plaintiff requiring plaintiff’s attendance to be examined and to produce documents – Whether s 596A is an exercise of judicial power.
Documents
12/09/2016 Writ of summons
12/09/2016 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiff)
15/09/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Brisbane)
06/10/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
06/10/2016 Chronology (Plaintiff)
10/10/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Canberra v/link Sydney & Brisbane)
24/10/2016 Written submissions (First Defendants)
24/10/2016 Written submissions (Second Defendants)
28/10/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
28/10/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
28/10/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
28/10/2016 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
03/11/2016 Reply
10/11/2016 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
08/02/2017 Judgment (Judgment Summary)