Graham v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Case No.
M97/2016
Related matter:
P58/2016 – Te Puia v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Case Information
Catchwords
decision made by the Minister personally to cancel applicant’s visa pursuant to s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether beyond power of Parliament to authorise decision under s501(3) in reliance on information protected from disclosure by s503A - whether decision based on mistake of law - whether in finding that cancellation of visa was in national interest, defendant acted upon misunderstanding of the Act and/or failed to make a critical finding of fact.
Documents
15/07/2016 Application for an order to show cause
11/08/2016 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiff)
27/10/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne)
10/11/2016 Special Case Stated
14/11/2016 Hearing (Single Justice, Melbourne)
12/12/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
12/12/2016 Chronology
25/01/2017 Written submissions (Defendant and Commonwealth Attorney-General intervening)
02/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Victoria intervening)
02/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
06/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania intervening)
10/02/2017 Reply (Plaintiff)
28/02/2017 Amended written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
30/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/09/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Knight v. State of Victoria & Anor
Case No.
M251/2015
Case Information
Catchwords
Plaintiff was sentenced to life imprisonment with minimum term of 27 years - Victorian Parliament passed Corrections Amendment (Parole) Act 2014 which provided that plaintiff cannot seek parole unless he is in imminent danger of dying or is seriously physically incapacitated and no longer has the physical capacity to harm any person - plaintiff alleges s 74AA of the Corrections Act 1986 (Vic) is contrary to Ch 111 of the Constitution and is invalid.
Documents
22/12/2015 Writ of summons
22/12/2015 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiff)
31/03/2016 Submitting appearance (Second Defendant)
04/11/2016 Special case stated
14/11/2016 Order by consent referring special case stated to Full Court
16/12/2016 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
20/01/2017 Written submissions (First Defendant)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales intervening)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the State of Queensland intervening)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia intervening)
03/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General for the State of South Australia intervening)
17/02/2017 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
03/03/2017 Reply
28/03/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
17/08/2017 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Perara-Cathcart v. The Queen
Date: 11 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 10m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- Palmer v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
- Ferguson v. Marcus William Ayres, Stephen James Parbery and Michael Andrew Owen in their capacities as liquidators of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Date: 10 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 56m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- Western Australian Planning Commission v. Southregal Pty Ltd & Anor
- Western Australian Planning Commission v. Leith
Date: 09 November 2016
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 32m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.