Craig v. The Queen
Case No.
B24/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
21/06/2016 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Fraser JA, Gotterson JA, Morrison JA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Murder – Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) s 668E – Miscarriage of justice – Where appellant advised by trial counsel that if he gave evidence at trial, he would likely be cross-examined on prior convictions, including manslaughter conviction – Where appellant did not give evidence – Where proposed evidence would have been relevant to defence of provocation and would have raised self-defence – Where Court of Appeal held it was not likely that appellant would have been cross-examined on criminal history – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding erroneous advice did not result in miscarriage of justice – Whether “alternative rational basis” for not giving evidence test appropriate where counsel gave erroneous advice – Whether denial of opportunity to make informed decision as to whether to give evidence amounts to “such a serious breach of the presuppositions of the trial” that the proviso cannot apply.
Documents
07/04/2017 Hearing (SLA, Brisbane)
20/04/2017 Notice of appeal
12/05/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
12/05/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
02/06/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)
14/12/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
21/03/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Falzon v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Case No.
S31/2017
Case Information
Catchwords
Constitutional law – Migration – Where plaintiff’s visa cancelled pursuant to Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501(3A) – Where Minister decided not to revoke cancellation under s 501CA – Whether s 501(3A) is invalid because it purports to confer judicial power of Commonwealth on Minister.
Documents
14/02/2017 Application for an order to show cause
14/02/2017 Notice of constitutional matter (Plaintiff)
11/04/2017 Hearing (Single Justice, Brisbane v/link Sydney)
10/05/2017 Written submissions (Plaintiff)
10/05/2017 Chronology (Plaintiff)
07/06/2017 Written submissions (Defendant and Attorney-General of the Commonwealth intervening)
21/06/2017 Reply (Plaintiff)
14/11/2017 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
07/02/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: The Queen v. Dickman
Date: 06 April 2017
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 1h 47m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- SZTAL v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor
- SZTGM v. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor
Date: 05 April 2017
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 24m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: IL v. The Queen
Date: 04 April 2017
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 3h 13m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.