Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Cases:
- Burns v. Gaynor & Ors
- Burns v. Corbett & Ors
- Attorney General for New South Wales v. Burns & Ors
- Attorney General for New South Wales v. Burns & Ors
- State of New South Wales v. Burns & Ors
Date: 05 December 2017
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 26m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Ceremonial Sitting in Memory of the late The Right Honourable Sir Ninian Stephen
Date: 05 December 2017
Transcript: Available
AV time: 14m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Collins v. The Queen
Case No.
B68/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
2/06/2017 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Gotterson and Morrison JJA and Burns J)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Appeal against conviction – Proviso – Where appellant convicted of three counts of sexual assault and one count of rape – Where trial judge directed jury inconsistency between complainant’s mother’s evidence at committal hearing and trial relevant to mother’s credibility but not complainant’s credibility – Where Court of Appeal found trial judge misdirected jury – Where Crown did not submit proviso should apply – Where Court of Appeal applied proviso and dismissed appeal – Whether Court of Appeal erred in applying proviso.
Documents
17/11/2017 Hearing (SLA, Canberra v/link Brisbane)
29/11/2017 Notice of appeal
11/12/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
11/12/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
17/01/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
02/02/2018 Reply
22/03/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
22/03/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
22/03/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
09/05/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors
Case No.
M175/2017
Related matters:
M168/2017 - Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
M174/2017 - Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
M176/2017 - Rick Tucker (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/05/2017 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Maxwell P, Redlich and Beach JJA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Stay of proceedings – Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – Investigations – Where Australian Federal Police (“AFP”) commenced investigation – Where appellants summoned by Australian Crime Commission for compulsory examination – Where examiner failed to make non-publication direction under s 25A(9) of Act prohibiting publication of examination material concerning appellants to AFP and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions – Where primary judge found examination conducted for improper purpose of assisting AFP and had unfair consequences for trial – Where primary judge ordered permanent stay of proceedings – Where Court of Appeal quashed order – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding unlawful compulsory examination for purpose of achieving forensic advantage insufficient in circumstances to justify permanent stay of proceedings.
Documents
17/11/2017 Hearing (SLA, Melbourne)
01/12/2017 Notice of appeal
14/12/2017 Submitting appearance (Fourth Respondent)
14/12/2017 Submitting appearance (Fifth Respondent)
22/12/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
22/12/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
19/01/2018 Written submissions (First Respondent)
19/01/2018 Written submissions (Second Respondent)
09/02/2018 Reply to first respondent
09/02/2018 Reply to second respondent
08/05/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (First Respondent)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (Second Respondent)
09/05/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
16/05/2018 Written submissions on standing (Second Respondent)
24/05/2018 Written submissions in response to submissions on standing (Appellant)
08/11/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/11/2018 Judgment (Judgment Summary)
Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors
Case No.
M174/2017
Related matters:
M168/2017 - Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
M175/2017 - Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
M176/2017 - Rick Tucker (a pseudonym) v. Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors [Appeal]
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
25/05/2017 Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal) (Maxwell P, Redlich and Beach JJA)
Catchwords
Criminal law – Stay of proceedings – Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – Investigations – Where Australian Federal Police (“AFP”) commenced investigation – Where appellants summoned by Australian Crime Commission for compulsory examination – Where examiner failed to make non-publication direction under s 25A(9) of Act prohibiting publication of examination material concerning appellants to AFP and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions – Where primary judge found examination conducted for improper purpose of assisting AFP and had unfair consequences for trial – Where primary judge ordered permanent stay of proceedings – Where Court of Appeal quashed order – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding unlawful compulsory examination for purpose of achieving forensic advantage insufficient in circumstances to justify permanent stay of proceedings.
Documents
17/11/2017 Hearing (SLA, Melborne)
01/12/2017 Notice of appeal
08/12/2017 Submitting appearance (Third Respondent)
14/12/2017 Submitting appearance (Fourth Respondent)
14/12/2017 Submitting appearance (Fifth Respondent)
22/12/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
22/12/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
19/01/2018 Written submissions (First Respondent)
19/01/2018 Written submissions (Second Respondent)
09/02/2018 Reply to first respondent
08/05/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (First Respondent)
08/05/2018 Outline of oral argument (Second Respondent)
09/05/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
16/05/2018 Written submissions on standing (Second Respondent)
08/11/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra)
08/11/2018 Judgment (Judgment Summary)