Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: Coshott v. Spencer & Ors
Date: 10 May 2018
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 52m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
WET 052 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
S267/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
6/11/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan J)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
20/11/2017 Notice of appeal
05/02/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
05/02/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
26/02/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
12/03/2018 Reply (Appellant)
15/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
15/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
15/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
17/10/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
ETA067 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
M167/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
13/11/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan ACJ)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
27/11/2017 Notice of appeal
29/01/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
29/01/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
19/02/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
06/03/2018 Reply (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
17/10/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
HFM043 v. Republic of Nauru
Case No.
M146/2017
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
22/09/2017 Supreme Court of Nauru (Khan J)
Catchwords
Migration – Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 (Cth) – Refugees Convention Act 2012 (Nr) – Where appellant applied to Nauru for refugee status determination under Act
Documents
06/10/2017 Notice of appeal
17/11/2017 Written submissions (Appellant)
17/11/2017 Chronology (Appellant)
20/12/2017 Written submissions (Respondent)
09/02/2018 Reply
14/03/2018 Summons seeking leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
14/06/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
15/08/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Comptroller General of Customs v. Zappia
Case No.
S91/2018
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
19/09/2017 Federal Court of Australia (Davies J, White J, Moshinsky J)
Catchwords
Interpretation – Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 35A – Where respondent employed as general manager of company operating warehouse – Where cigarettes stolen from warehouse – Where respondent served with notice under s 35A of Act requiring payment of amount of duty payable on stolen cigarettes – Where Administrative Appeals Tribunal dismissed application for review of decision to issue notice – Where Full Federal Court allowed appeal – Whether majority of Full Court erred in holding employee of entity holding license to warehouse dutiable goods not capable of being “person who has, or has been entrusted with, the possession, custody or control of dutiable goods” within meaning of s 35A(1) – Whether majority of Full Court erred in holding that on proper construction of s 35A(1), statutory demand issued by appellant to respondent invalid and of no effect.
Documents
21/03/2018 Determination (SLA, Canberra)
04/04/2018 Notice of appeal
09/05/2018 Written submissions (Appellant)
10/05/2018 Chronology (Appellant)
06/06/2018 Written submissions (Respondent)
27/06/2018 Reply
08/08/2018 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
08/08/2018 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
08/08/2018 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
14/11/2018 Judgment (Judgment summary)