Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: VUNILAGI V THE QUEEN & ANOR
Date: 08 February 2023
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 4h 32m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: BA V THE KING
Date: 07 February 2023
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 2h 23m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Audio-visual recordings of Full Court hearings heard in Canberra
Case: CEREMONIAL SITTING ON THE OCCASION OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR COUNSEL
Date: 06 February 2023
Transcript: Hearing
AV time: 0h 20m
You accept the terms of use (below) by playing this audio-visual recording.
Terms of use
Access to the audio-visual recordings of the Court is subject to the following conditions:
(1) You will not record, copy, modify, reproduce, publish, republish, upload, post, transmit, broadcast, rebroadcast, store, distribute or otherwise make available, in any manner, any proceeding or part of any proceeding, other than with prior written approval of the Court. However, schools and universities may broadcast/rebroadcast proceedings in a classroom setting for educational purposes without prior written approval.
(2) The audio-visual material available via our web-site of Court proceedings does not constitute the official record of the Court.
(3) Copyright of the footage of the proceedings is retained by the Court.
By clicking "play" (the triangle controls on the video player), you agree to be bound by these terms of use.
Crime and Corruption Commission v. Carne
Case No.
B66/2022
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
05/08/2022 Supreme Court of Queensland (Court of Appeal) (Mullins & McMurdo JJA, Freeburn J)
Catchwords
Constitutional law – Legislature – Privileges – Privilege of parliamentary debate and proceedings – Where Crime and Corruption Commission ("Commission") received complaint as to allegations of corrupt conduct against respondent, former Public Trustee of Queensland – Where, following investigation, Commission prepared draft report, which did not make any finding of corrupt conduct – Where Commission submitted copy of Report to Chair of Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee ("PCCC") and requested, pursuant to s 69(1)(b) of Crime and Corruption Act 2001 (Qld) ("CC Act"), that it be given to Speaker – Where respondent filed originating application seeking declaration that report was not "report" for purposes of s 69(1) of CC Act – Where Chair of PCCC issued evidentiary certificate under s 55 of Parliament of Queensland Act 2001 (Qld) ("POQ Act") certifying report as: document prepared for purpose of, or incidental to, transacting business of PCCC under s 9(2)(c) of CC Act; and document present or submitted to PCCC – Where s 8(1) of POQ Act provides proceedings in Assembly cannot be impeached or questioned in any court – Whether parliamentary privilege protects reports prepared for and provided to parliamentary committees under POQ Act.
Statutes – Acts of Parliament – Interpretation – Where s 33 of CC Act provides for Commission's corruption functions – Where s 64 of CC Act provides Commission may report in performing its functions – Where s 69(1) provides report may be tabled in Parliament when report is made on a public hearing or report is directed to be given to Speaker – Where respondent contended that because report did not make finding of "corrupt conduct" and did not relate to public hearing, it was not report for purposes of s 69 of CC Act – Whether Commission only able to report about corruption investigation under CC Act where positive finding of "corrupt conduct".
Documents*
15/12/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra)
23/12/2022 Notice of appeal
02/02/2023 Written submissions (Appellant)
02/02/2023 Chronology (Appellant)
24/02/2023 Written submissions (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, seeking leave to intervene)
24/02/2023 Written submissions (Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland, seeking leave to intervene)
10/03/2023 Written submissions (Respondent)
30/03/2023 Reply (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, seeking leave to intervene)
31/03/2023 Reply (Appellant)
06/06/2023 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Respondent)
06/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, intervening)
05/06/2023 Outline of oral argument (Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland, intervening)
07/06/2023 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
13/09/2023 Judgment (Judgment summary)
Harvey & Ors v. Minister for Primary Industry and Resources & Ors
Case No.
D9/2022
Case Information
Lower Court Judgment
29/04/2022 Federal Court of Australia (Jagot, Charlesworth and O’Bryan JJ)
Catchwords
Statutes – Interpretation – Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s 24MD(6B)(b) – Meaning of "right to mine" – Meaning of "infrastructure facility" – Where first respondent intended to grant mineral lease (ML 29881) to third respondent under s 40(1)(b)(ii) of Mineral Titles Act 2010 (NT) – Where land subject to proposed lease would be used for construction of "dredge spoil emplacement area" to deposit dredged material from loading facility located on adjacent land subject to mineral lease already held by third respondent –Whether proposed grant of ML 29881 is future act within s 24MD(6B)(b) of Native Title Act, being creation of right to mine for sole purpose of construction of infrastructure facility associated with mining.
Documents*
16/12/2022 Hearing (SLA, Canberra by video connection)
22/12/2022 Notice of appeal
03/02/2023 Written submissions (Appellant)
03/02/2023 Chronology (Appellant)
03/03/2023 Written submissions (First and Second Respondents)
03/03/2023 Written submissions (Third Respondent)
24/03/2023 Reply
05/09/2023 Hearing (Full Court, Canberra) (Audio-visual recording)
05/09/2023 Outline of oral argument (Appellant)
05/09/2023 Outline of oral argument (First and Second Respondents)
04/09/2023 Outline of oral argument (Third Respondent)
07/02/2024 Judgment (Judgment Summary)